4.6 Article

An Insect Herbivore Microbiome with High Plant Biomass-Degrading Capacity

Journal

PLOS GENETICS
Volume 6, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001129

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. DOE Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center [DE-FC02-07ER64494]
  2. National Science Foundation [DEB-0747002, MCB-0702025, MCB-0731822]
  3. Smithsonian Institution Predoctoral Fellowship
  4. Organization for Tropical Studies Research Fellowship
  5. USDA-ARS [3655-41000-005-00D]
  6. US Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute
  7. Office of Science of the US Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  8. Roche Diagnostics
  9. Division Of Environmental Biology
  10. Direct For Biological Sciences [0747002] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Herbivores can gain indirect access to recalcitrant carbon present in plant cell walls through symbiotic associations with lignocellulolytic microbes. A paradigmatic example is the leaf-cutter ant (Tribe:Attini), which uses fresh leaves to cultivate a fungus for food in specialized gardens. Using a combination of sugar composition analyses, metagenomics, and whole-genome sequencing, we reveal that the fungus garden microbiome of leaf-cutter ants is composed of a diverse community of bacteria with high plant biomass-degrading capacity. Comparison of this microbiome's predicted carbohydrate-degrading enzyme profile with other metagenomes shows closest similarity to the bovine rumen, indicating evolutionary convergence of plant biomass degrading potential between two important herbivorous animals. Genomic and physiological characterization of two dominant bacteria in the fungus garden microbiome provides evidence of their capacity to degrade cellulose. Given the recent interest in cellulosic biofuels, understanding how large-scale and rapid plant biomass degradation occurs in a highly evolved insect herbivore is of particular relevance for bioenergy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available