4.6 Article

Mis-Spliced Transcripts of Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor alpha 6 Are Associated with Field Evolved Spinosad Resistance in Plutella xylostella (L.)

Journal

PLOS GENETICS
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000802

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. BBSRC
  2. Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
  3. Australian Research Council
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/E021107/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. BBSRC [BB/E021107/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The evolution of insecticide resistance is a global constraint to agricultural production. Spinosad is a new, low-environmental-risk insecticide that primarily targets nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChR) and is effective against a wide range of pest species. However, after only a few years of application, field evolved resistance emerged in the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella, an important pest of brassica crops worldwide. Spinosad resistance in a Hawaiian population results from a single incompletely recessive and autosomal gene, and here we use AFLP linkage mapping to identify the chromosome controlling resistance in a backcross family. Recombinational mapping with more than 700 backcross progeny positioned a putative spinosad target, nAChR alpha 6 (Px alpha 6), at the resistance locus, PxSpinR. A mutation within the ninth intron splice junction of Px alpha 6 results in mis-splicing of transcripts, which produce a predicted protein truncated between the third and fourth transmembrane domains. Additional resistance-associated Pxa6 transcripts that excluded the mutation containing exon were detected, and these were also predicted to produce truncated proteins. Identification of the locus of resistance in this important crop pest will facilitate field monitoring of the spread of resistance and offer insights into the genetic basis of spinosad resistance in other species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available