4.6 Article

Crowdsourcing image analysis for plant phenomics to generate ground truth data for machine learning

Journal

PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
Volume 14, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006337

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Iowa State University Presidential Interdisciplinary Research Initiative
  2. Iowa State University Plant Sciences Institute Faculty Scholars Program
  3. USDA Agricultural Research Service
  4. National Science Foundation [ABI 1458359]
  5. Iowa State University
  6. Div Of Biological Infrastructure
  7. Direct For Biological Sciences [1458359] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The accuracy of machine learning tasks critically depends on high quality ground truth data. Therefore, in many cases, producing good ground truth data typically involves trained professionals; however, this can be costly in time, effort, and money. Here we explore the use of crowdsourcing to generate a large number of training data of good quality. We explore an image analysis task involving the segmentation of corn tassels from images taken in a field setting. We investigate the accuracy, speed and other quality metrics when this task is performed by students for academic credit, Amazon MTurk workers, and Master Amazon MTurk workers. We conclude that the Amazon MTurk and Master Mturk workers perform significantly better than the for-credit students, but with no significant difference between the two MTurk worker types. Furthermore, the quality of the segmentation produced by Amazon MTurk workers rivals that of an expert worker. We provide best practices to assess the quality of ground truth data, and to compare data quality produced by different sources. We conclude that properly managed crowdsourcing can be used to establish large volumes of viable ground truth data at a low cost and high quality, especially in the context of high throughput plant phenotyping. We also provide several metrics for assessing the quality of the generated datasets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available