4.6 Article

Accelerated Adaptive Evolution on a Newly Formed X Chromosome

Journal

PLOS BIOLOGY
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages 712-719

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000082

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation Biological Informatics Postdoctoral Fellowship
  2. National Institutes of Health [GM076007]
  3. Alfred P. Sloan Faculty Research Fellowship
  4. David and Lucile Packard Foundation Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sex chromosomes originated from ordinary autosomes, and their evolution is characterized by continuous gene loss from the ancestral Y chromosome. Here, we document a new feature of sex chromosome evolution: bursts of adaptive fixations on a newly formed X chromosome. Taking advantage of the recently formed neo-X chromosome of Drosophila miranda, we compare patterns of DNA sequence variation at genes located on the neo-X to genes on the ancestral X chromosome. This contrast allows us to draw inferences of selection on a newly formed X chromosome relative to background levels of adaptation in the genome while controlling for demographic effects. Chromosome-wide synonymous diversity on the neo-X is reduced 2-fold relative to the ancestral X, as expected under recent and recurrent directional selection. Several statistical tests employing various features of the data consistently identify 10%-15% of neo-X genes as targets of recent adaptive evolution but only 1%-3% of genes on the ancestral X. In addition, both the rate of adaptation and the fitness effects of adaptive substitutions are estimated to be roughly an order of magnitude higher for neo-X genes relative to genes on the ancestral X. Thus, newly formed X chromosomes are not passive players in the evolutionary process of sex chromosome differentiation, but respond adaptively to both their sex-biased transmission and to Y chromosome degeneration, possibly through demasculinization of their gene content and the evolution of dosage compensation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available