4.1 Article

Self-reported Pediatric Measures of Physical Activity, Sedentary Behavior, and Strength Impact for PROMIS: Conceptual Framework

Journal

PEDIATRIC PHYSICAL THERAPY
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages 376-384

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/PEP.0000000000000073

Keywords

adolescent; child; female; health status; humans; information systems; male; outcome assessment (health care)/methods; parents; pediatrics/methods; physical activities; quality of life; sedentary lifestyle; strengthening

Funding

  1. NIH/NIAMS [U01 AR057956]
  2. National Institutes of Health (NIH) Common Fund Initiative [U54AR057951, U01AR052177, U54AR057943, U54AR057926, U01AR057948, U01AR057954, U01AR052171, U01AR052181, U01AR057956, U01AR052158, U01AR057929, U01AR057936, U01AR052155, U01AR057971, U01AR057940, U01AR057967, U01AR052186]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Children's physical activity (PA) levels are commonly assessed in pediatric clinical research, but rigorous self-report assessment tools for children are scarce, and computer adaptive test implementations are rare. Our objective was to improve pediatric self-report measures of activity using semistructured interviews with experts and children for conceptualization of a child-informed framework. Methods: Semistructured interviews were conducted to conceptualize PA, sedentary behaviors, and strengthening activities. We performed systematic literature reviews to identify item-level concepts used to assess these 3 domains. Results: We developed conceptual frameworks for each domain using words and phrases identified by children as relevant. Conclusions: Semistructured interview methods provide valuable information of children's perspectives and the ways children recall previous activities. Conceptualized domains of PA are based on the literature and expert views, which also reflect children's experiences and understanding, providing a basis for pediatric self-report instruments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available