3.9 Article

Depression and traumatic brain injury: symptom profiles of patients treated with cognitive-behavioral therapy or supportive psychotherapy

Journal

NEUROPSYCHIATRY
Volume 3, Issue 6, Pages 601-609

Publisher

FUTURE MEDICINE LTD
DOI: 10.2217/npy.13.75

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, US Department of Education [H133B040033, H133P100016/H133P050004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims: This study aimed to examine the differential treatment effects of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and supportive psychotherapy (SPT) on self-reported symptoms of depression in individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) who sought treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD). Methods: Participants were individuals with a documented TBI meeting criteria for MDD who, as part of a larger randomized controlled trial comparing treatments for MDD after TBI, received CBT (n = 22) or SPT (n = 22). The average age of participants was 48.8 years (standard deviation = 10.2), 57.1% were female, 57.5% were Caucasian, 20% were Hispanic and 15% were African-American. The main outcome measure was the Beck Depression InventoryII (BDI-II). Results: Mean total BDI-II score for all participants combined at baseline was 25 (standard deviation = 10.0). There were no significant differences in total BDI-II score between treatment groups at either baseline or at the end of treatment. Participants treated with CBT reported significant improvements in sadness, loss of interest and loss of interest in sex, while participants treated with SPT reported significant improvements in symptoms of agitation and irritability. Conclusion: SPT may better target symptoms of behavioral disinhibition (agitation and irritability), while CBT may better target mood symptoms (sadness) and their behavioral manifestations (loss of interest and loss of interest in sex).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available