4.3 Article

ASSESSMENT OF TISSUE OPTICAL CLEARING AS A FUNCTION OF GLUCOSE CONCENTRATION USING OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY

Journal

JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE OPTICAL HEALTH SCIENCES
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages 169-176

Publisher

WORLD SCIENTIFIC PUBL CO PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1142/S1793545810001039

Keywords

Glucose; porcine skin; percent clearing; scattering coefficient; optical coherence tomography

Funding

  1. Institute of Biomedical Imaging Sciences [IBIS-97708]
  2. CRDF [RUB1-2932-SR-08]
  3. NSF [CMMI-0900743]
  4. RF Ministry of Science and Education [2.1.1/4989, 2.2.1.1/2950]
  5. Federal Agency of Education of RF [1.4.09]
  6. RF Governmental contracts [02.740.11.0484, 02.740.11.0770]
  7. [224014 Photonics4life-FP7-ICT-2007-2]
  8. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  9. Directorate For Engineering [0900743] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

One of the major challenges in imaging biological tissues using optical techniques, such as optical coherence tomography (OCT), is the lack of light penetration due to highly turbid structures within the tissue. Optical clearing techniques enable the biological samples to be more optically homogeneous, allowing for deeper penetration of light into the tissue. This study investigates the effect of optical clearing utilizing various concentrations of glucose solution (10%, 30%, and 50%) on porcine skin. A gold-plated mirror was imaged beneath the tissue and percentage clearing was determined by monitoring the change in reflected light intensity from the mirror over time. The ratio of percentage clearing per tissue thickness for 10%, 30% and 50% glucose was determined to be 4.7 +/- 1.6% mm(-1) (n = 6), 10.6 +/- 2.0% mm(-1) (n = 7) and 21.8 +/- 2.2% mm(-1) (n = 5), respectively. It was concluded that while higher glucose concentration has the highest optical clearing effect, a suitable concentration should be chosen for the purpose of clearing, considering the osmotic stress on the tissue sample.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available