4.5 Article

Effect of Diamel in patients with metabolic syndrome: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study

Journal

JOURNAL OF DIABETES
Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages 180-191

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1753-0407.12007

Keywords

Diamel; insulin resistance; insulin sensitivity; metabolic syndrome; uric acid

Funding

  1. Catalysis Laboratories (Madrid, Spain)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The aim of the present study was to determine whether the administration of Diamel, marketed as a food supplement by Catalysis Laboratories (Madrid, Spain) could improve any of the components of metabolic syndrome (MS), as well as insulin resistance and sensitivity. Methods: In all, 100 patients with MS (19-70 years of age) who satisfied the World Health Organization criteria for MS were included in the study. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either oral Diamel or a placebo (while maintaining a diet appropriate to their weight and physical activity) at a dose of two capsules before each of the three main meals each day for 1 year. Anthropometric indices, blood pressure, fasting plasma glucose, lipid profile, insulin, creatinine, and uric acid (UA) were determined. Insulin resistance (IR) was assessed and three indirect indices were used to calculate insulin sensitivity (IS). Results: Compared with placebo, Diamel improved fasting insulin concentrations, IS, and IR and reduced UA concentrations from 6 months until the end of treatment (P < 0.05 for all). In addition, after 12 months treatment with Diamel, significant changes from baseline were seen for mean fasting insulin (P < 0.05), UA (P < 0.05), IR (P < 0.001), and IS (P < 0.001), whereas no such changes were seen in the placebo-treated group. Improvements were noted in body mass index, IR, and IS in both groups. Conclusions: Long-term Diamel treatment, combined with lifestyle changes, was beneficial for IR and IS, and reduced serum UA levels in patients with MS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available