4.6 Article

Triaxial creep tests of weak sandstone from fracture zone of high dam foundation

Journal

JOURNAL OF CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY
Volume 20, Issue 9, Pages 2528-2536

Publisher

JOURNAL OF CENTRAL SOUTH UNIV TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1007/s11771-013-1765-7

Keywords

hydropower station; weak sandstone; creep properties; triaxial compression tests; triaxial creep tests; improved Burgers creep model

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2011CB013504]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11172090]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The lithology of fracture zone which was developed at the dam foundation of a hydropower station is weak sandstone with poor integrity and pore cementation contact. Its creep properties have a significant impact on the deformation and stability of the dam. Based on the characteristics of loose organizational structure, high moisture content and poor mechanical properties, the triaxial compression tests and creep tests were carried out, respectively. The results show significant non-linear, low strength and no obvious strength peaks. Both axial and lateral strains are achieved more than 3% when the tests are failed. The weak sandstone has a significant creep property, but only transient and steady state appear under low stress. Increased stress causes creep intensified and lateral strain gradually exceeds axial strain. In the failure stage, it has characteristics of large axial plastic deformation, obvious volumetric ductility dilation and large steady creep rate. The accelerated creep appears shortly after transient loading under confining of pressures 1.0 MPa and 1.5 MPa. Therefore, an improved Burgers creep model considering the non-linear characteristics of weak sandstone is built based on hyperbolic equation and the creep parameters are identified. This model can well describe the creep properties of weak sandstone.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available