4.4 Article

Repeated Blood Collection for Blood Tests in Adult Zebrafish

Journal

JOVE-JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS
Volume -, Issue 102, Pages -

Publisher

JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS
DOI: 10.3791/53272

Keywords

Basic Protocol; Issue 102; Repeated blood collection; adult zebrafish; dorsal aorta; hemoglobin; fasting blood glucose; plasma triacylglycerol; total cholesterol; animal model

Funding

  1. JSPS KAKENHI Grant [25860294, 25590073]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25860294, 25590073, 15K19074] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Repeated blood collection is one of the most common techniques performed on laboratory animals. However, a non-lethal protocol for blood collection from zebrafish has not been established. The previous methods for blood collection from zebrafish are lethal, such as lateral incision, decapitation and tail ablation. Thus we have developed a novel repeated blood collection method, and present here a detailed protocol outlining this procedure. This method is minimally invasive and results in a very low mortality rate (2.3%) for zebrafish, thus enabling repeated blood sampling from the same individual. The maximum volume of blood sampling is dependent on body weight of the fish. The volume for repeated blood sampling at intervals should be <= 0.4% of body weight every week or <= 1% every 2 weeks, which were evaluated by measurements of blood hemoglobin. Additionally, hemoglobin, fasting blood glucose, plasma triacylglycerol (TG) and total cholesterol levels in male and female adult zebrafish were measured. We also applied this method to investigate the dysregulation of glucose metabolism in diet-induced obesity. This blood collection method will allow many applications, including glucose and lipid metabolism and hematological studies, which will increase the use of zebrafish as a human disease model organism.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available