4.4 Article

Day-to-Day Variation in Food Intake and Energy Expenditure in Healthy Women: The Dietitian II Study

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF NUTRITION AND DIETETICS
Volume 113, Issue 11, Pages 1532-1538

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2013.07.001

Keywords

Dietary intakes; Energy expenditure; Energy intake; Leptin; Doubly labeled water

Funding

  1. US Department of Agriculture

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Because day-to-day food intake varies, we tested the hypothesis that ad libitum food intake and energy expenditure show corrective responses over periods of 1 to 10 days in healthy young women. Food intake and accelerometry measurements were collected daily for 17 days in 15 young women. Total daily energy expenditure (TDEE) using doubly labeled water was also measured. The daily deviations in macronutrient and energy intake and energy expenditure from the average values were compared with the deviations observed over succeeding intervals to estimate the corrective responses. The intraindividual coefficients of variation for energy intake averaged +/- 25%, ranging from 16% to 34%. TDEE had a coefficient of variation of 8.3%, and accelerometry had a coefficient of variation of 8.4% (range=4.6% to 16.4%). Energy expenditure by accelerometry (2,087 +/- 191 kcal/day) was not significantly different from TDEE (2,128 +/- 177 kcal/day), but reported daily energy intake was 20.4% lower (1,693 +/- 276 kcal/day). There were significant corrective responses in energy from fat and total energy intake. This occurred from Days 3 to 6, with a peak at Day 5 that disappeared when data were randomized within each subject. Human beings show corrective responses to deviations from average energy and macronutrient intakes with a lag time of 3 to 6 days, but not 1 to 2 days. These corrective responses are likely to play a role in bringing about weight stability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available