4.3 Article

Analysis of Historical Sources of Heavy Metals in Lake Taihu Based on the Positive Matrix Factorization Model

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15071540

Keywords

sediment; positive matrix factorization; heavy metal; source resolution

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41771243]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFD0800305]
  3. Scientific Research Foundation of the Graduate School of Nanjing University [2016CL04]
  4. Special Fund for Research in the Public Interest of Ministry of Land and Resources [201511001-03]
  5. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018T110478, 2017M621699]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Analysis of sediment grain sizes and heavy metal correlations in the western part of Lake Taihu shows that the grain size of the sediment is stable as a whole. With increasing depth, the grain size tends to decrease. Heavy metals such as Cr, Cd, Pd and Sr are strongly correlated and influence each other. Based on the positive matrix factorization (PMF) model, this study classified the origin of heavy metals in the sediments of western Lake Taihu into three major categories: Agricultural, industrial and geogenic. The contributions of the three heavy metal sources in each sample were analyzed and calculated. Overall, prior to the Chinese economic reform, the study area mainly practiced agriculture. The sources of heavy metals in the sediments were mostly of agricultural and geogenic origin, and remained relatively stable with contribution rates of 44.07 +/- 11.84% (n = 30) and 35.67 +/- 11.70% (n = 30), respectively. After the reform and opening up of China, as the economy experienced rapid development, industry and agriculture became the main sources of heavy metals in sediments, accounting for 56.99 +/- 15.73% (n = 15) and 31.22 +/- 14.31% (n = 15), respectively. The PMF model is convenient and efficient, and a good method to determine the origin of heavy metals in sediments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available