4.3 Article

Exposure to Neighborhood Green Space and Mental Health: Evidence from the Survey of the Health of Wisconsin

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph110303453

Keywords

green space; nature; neighborhood environment; mental health; population-based surveys; United States

Funding

  1. Clinical & Translational Science Institute of Southeast Wisconsin [NIH UL1RR031973]
  2. University of Wisconsin's (UW) Wisconsin Partnership Program [06012009]
  3. National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute [1RC2HL101468-01]
  4. UW Institute for Clinical and Translational Research [KL2-RR025012]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Green space is now widely viewed as a health-promoting characteristic of residential environments, and has been linked to mental health benefits such as recovery from mental fatigue and reduced stress, particularly through experimental work in environmental psychology. Few population level studies have examined the relationships between green space and mental health. Further, few studies have considered the role of green space in non-urban settings. This study contributes a population-level perspective from the United States to examine the relationship between environmental green space and mental health outcomes in a study area that includes a spectrum of urban to rural environments. Multivariate survey regression analyses examine the association between green space and mental health using the unique, population-based Survey of the Health of Wisconsin database. Analyses were adjusted for length of residence in the neighborhood to reduce the impact of neighborhood selection bias. Higher levels of neighborhood green space were associated with significantly lower levels of symptomology for depression, anxiety and stress, after controlling for a wide range of confounding factors. Results suggest that greening could be a potential population mental health improvement strategy in the United States.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available