4.3 Editorial Material

Health Economic Assessment: Cost-Effectiveness Thresholds and Other Decision Criteria Reply

Publisher

MDPI AG
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph7041835

Keywords

health economics; economic evaluation; cost-effectiveness; cost-effectiveness threshold; opportunity cost; decision criteria; multi-criteria decision analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An article published in this Journal argued that New Zealand does not apply a cost-effectiveness threshold because medicines are funded within a fixed budget and because cost-effectiveness is only one of nine criteria that inform decisions. This Comment has explained that, from a theoretical perspective, the cost-effectiveness threshold model is not inconsistent with these two arguments. The observed annual variation in incremental cost-effectiveness ratios in New Zealand may originate from yearly differences in new medicines that request reimbursement and in the budget size, and from the fact that decision makers take into account other decision criteria in addition to cost-effectiveness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available