4.2 Article

HIV diagnoses in indigenous peoples: comparison of Australia, Canada and New Zealand

Journal

INTERNATIONAL HEALTH
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages 193-198

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.inhe.2011.03.010

Keywords

HIV; Generalised epidemic; National surveillance; Indigenous; Australia; Canada; New Zealand

Funding

  1. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC)
  2. Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR)
  3. Health Research Council (HRC) of New Zealand
  4. Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing
  5. National Health and Medical Research Council
  6. New Zealand Ministry of Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In industrial countries, a number of factors put indigenous peoples at increased risk of HIV infection. National surveillance data between 1999 and 2008 provided diagnoses for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders (Australia). First Nations, Inuit and Metis (Canada excluding Ontario and Quebec) and Mori (New Zealand). Each country provided similar data for a non-indigenous comparison population. Direct standardisation used the 2001 Canadian Aboriginal male population for comparison of five-year diagnosis rates in 1999-2003 and 2004-2008. Using the general population as denominators, we report diagnosis ratios for presumed heterosexual transmission, men who have sex with men (MSM) and intravenous drug users (IDU). Age standardised HIV diagnosis rates in indigenous peoples in Canada in 2004-2008(178.1 and 178.4/100000 for men and women respectively) were higher than in Australia (48.5 and 12.9/100000) and New Zealand (41.9 and 4.3/100000). Higher HIV diagnosis rates related to heterosexual contact among Aboriginal peoples, especially women, in Canada confirm a widening epidemic beyond the conventional risk groups. This potential of a generalised epidemic requires urgent attention in Aboriginal communities; available evidence can inform policy and action by all stakeholders. Although less striking in Australia and New Zealand. these findings may be relevant to indigenous peoples in other countries. (C) 2011 Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available