4.4 Article

Effect of a dexamethasone Sinu-Foam™ middle meatal spacer on endoscopic sinus surgery outcomes: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Journal

INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages 248-251

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/alr.21011

Keywords

carboxymethylcellulose; chronic; dexamethasone; endoscopic; middle meatal spacer; rhinosinusitis; Sinu-Foam (TM); sinus; sinusitis; steroid; surgery

Funding

  1. Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, within the University of Calgary

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Off-label drug eluting middle-meatal spacers have shown promising results for improving clinical outcomes following endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). This study evaluates a dexamethasone Sinu-Foam (TM) spacer following ESS for CRS without nasal polyposis (CRSsNP). Methods: Patients with CRSsNP (n = 36) were enrolled into a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial and randomized into either a treatment arm (dexamethasone Sinu-Foam (TM) mixture; n = 18) or placebo arm(Sinu-Foam (TM) alone; n = 18). Therapeutic outcomes were evaluated at 1 week, 4 weeks, and 3 months using sinonasal endoscopy and graded using the Lund-Kennedy scoring system. Postoperative care included nasal saline irrigations and a short course of systemic steroids. Results: All patients completed the study follow-up period. Both study arms experienced significant improvement in endoscopic grading over the study duration (p < 0.001). There was no difference in average endoscopic scores be-tween the treatment and placebo groups at 1 week, 4 weeks, and 3 months (all p > 0.489). Conclusion: This study demonstrated that an off-label drug-eluting middle-meatal spacer of dexamethasone and Sinu-Foam (TM) does not improve endoscopic outcomes in the early postoperative period following ESS when combined with postoperative saline irrigations and a short course of systemic steroids. (C) 2011 ARS-AAOA, LLC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available