4.7 Article

A Unifying Framework for Typical Multitask Multiple Kernel Learning Problems

Journal

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TNNLS.2013.2291772

Keywords

Machine learning; optimization methods; pattern recognition; supervised learning; support vector machines (SVMs)

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [0806931, 0963146, 0525429, 1200566, 1161228, 0647018]
  2. Direct For Education and Human Resources
  3. Division Of Undergraduate Education [1161228] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Division Of Computer and Network Systems
  5. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [1200552] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Division Of Computer and Network Systems
  7. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [1200566] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Division Of Undergraduate Education
  9. Direct For Education and Human Resources [0806931] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Over the past few years, multiple kernel learning (MKL) has received significant attention among data-driven feature selection techniques in the context of kernel-based learning. MKL formulations have been devised and solved for a broad spectrum of machine learning problems, including multitask learning (MTL). Solving different MKL formulations usually involves designing algorithms that are tailored to the problem at hand, which is, typically, a nontrivial accomplishment. In this paper we present a general multitask multiple kernel learning (MT-MKL) framework that subsumes well-known MT-MKL formulations, as well as several important MKL approaches on single-task problems. We then derive a simple algorithm that can solve the unifying framework. To demonstrate the flexibility of the proposed framework, we formulate a new learning problem, namely partially-shared common space MT-MKL, and demonstrate its merits through experimentation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available