Journal
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL ADDICTIONS
Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages 151-154Publisher
AKADEMIAI KIADO RT
DOI: 10.1556/2006.4.2015.026
Keywords
behavioural addiction; severity; diagnosis; assessment; sensitivity; specificity; positive predictive value; negative predictive value; accuracy
Categories
Funding
- Hungarian Scientific Research Fund [K83884, K111938]
- Janos Bolyai Research Fellowship
- Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background and Aims: Survey-based studies often fail to take into account the predictive value of a test, in other words, the probability of a person having (or not having) the disease when scoring positive (or negative) on the given screening test. Methods: We re-visited the theory and basic calculations of diagnostic accuracy. Results: In general, the lower the prevalence the worse the predictive value is. When the disorder is relatively rare, a positive test finding is typically not useful in confirming its presence given the high proportion of false positive cases. For example, using the Compulsive Buying Scale (Faber & O'Guinn, 1992) three in four people classified as having compulsive buying disorder will in fact not have the disorder. Conclusions: Screening tests are limited to serve as an early detection gate and only clinical (interview-based) studies are suitable to claim that a certain behaviour is truly pathological.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available