Journal
GREENHOUSE GASES-SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages 920-931Publisher
WILEY PERIODICALS, INC
DOI: 10.1002/ghg.1805
Keywords
CO2 geosequestration; CO2 storage; heterogeneous reservoirs; trapping mechanisms; water-alternating gas
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Carbon geosequestration efficiency is affected by various factors including reservoir heterogeneity, caprock properties, rock wettability, aquifer brine salinity and injection-well configuration. Some parameters (e.g. the formation geology) cannot be changed but it is possible to select others and engineer an optimized storage program. One of these parameters is the way CO2 is injected into the reservoir. There are three main options for this: (1) continuous injection, (2) intermittent injection, and (3) water-alternating gas (WAG) injection. We thus studied the efficiency of each injection option and predicted the associated storage capacities and CO2-plume movements (which are related to the containment security). We found that WAG injection showed significantly superior behavior over continuous and intermittent injections (which resulted in similar CO2 flow responses). Specifically, residual and solubility trapping were significantly enhanced, whereas vertical CO2 migration was cut by approximately two-thirds. Thus, in the examined reservoir, the WAG injection is preferred as it strongly enhances CO2 storage efficiency and containment security. (c) 2018 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available