4.3 Article

Performance of the Cas9 Nickase System in Drosophila melanogaster

Journal

G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS
Volume 4, Issue 10, Pages 1955-1962

Publisher

GENETICS SOCIETY AMERICA
DOI: 10.1534/g3.114.013821

Keywords

CRISPR; Cas9; off-target; nickase; piwi

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20131351195, 31301008]
  2. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20121018577, 20120002110056, 20120141120046]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province [2013CFB031]
  4. National Basic Research Program (973 Program) [2013CB835100]
  5. Tsinghua-Peking Center for Life Sciences
  6. HBUT Starting Grant [BSQD12142]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent studies of the Cas9/sgRNA system in Drosophila melanogaster genome editing have opened new opportunities to generate site-specific mutant collections in a high-throughput manner. However, off-target effects of the system are still a major concern when analyzing mutant phenotypes. Mutations converting Cas9 to a DNA nickase have great potential for reducing off-target effects in vitro. Here, we demonstrated that injection of two plasmids encoding neighboring offset sgRNAs into transgenic Cas9(D10A) nickase flies efficiently produces heritable indel mutants. We then determined the effective distance between the two sgRNA targets and their orientations that affected the ability of the sgRNA pairs to generate mutations when expressed in the transgenic nickase flies. Interestingly, Cas9 nickase greatly reduces the ability to generate mutants with one sgRNA, suggesting that the application of Cas9 nickase and sgRNA pairs can almost avoid off-target effects when generating indel mutants. Finally, a defined piwi mutant allele is generated with this system through homology-directed repair. However, Cas9(D10A) is not as effective as Cas9 in replacing the entire coding sequence of piwi with two sgRNAs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available