4.3 Article

Population Structure in a Comprehensive Genomic Data Set on Human Microsatellite Variation

Journal

G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages 891-907

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1534/g3.113.005728

Keywords

population structure; relatives; short tandem repeats

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [GM081441, HG005855]
  2. Burroughs Wellcome Fund grant
  3. National Science Foundation Postdoctoral Research Fellowship in Biology grant [DBI-1103639]
  4. Div Of Biological Infrastructure
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences [1103639] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Over the past two decades, microsatellite genotypes have provided the data for landmark studies of human population-genetic variation. However, the various microsatellite data sets have been prepared with different procedures and sets of markers, so that it has been difficult to synthesize available data for a comprehensive analysis. Here, we combine eight human population-genetic data sets at the 645 microsatellite loci they share in common, accounting for procedural differences in the production of the different data sets, to assemble a single data set containing 5795 individuals from 267 worldwide populations. We perform a systematic analysis of genetic relatedness, detecting 240 intra-population and 92 inter-population pairs of previously unidentified close relatives and proposing standardized subsets of unrelated individuals for use in future studies. We then augment the human data with a data set of 84 chimpanzees at the 246 loci they share in common with the human samples. Multidimensional scaling and neighbor-joining analyses of these data sets offer new insights into the structure of human populations and enable a comparison of genetic variation patterns in chimpanzees with those in humans. Our combined data sets are the largest of their kind reported to date and provide a resource for use in human population-genetic studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available