4.7 Article

Biomass and Volume Yield in Mature Hybrid Poplar Plantations on Temperate Abandoned Farmland

Journal

FORESTS
Volume 5, Issue 12, Pages 3107-3130

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/f5123107

Keywords

Populus; afforestation; agroforestry; southern Quebec (Canada); allometry; biomass and volume equations; site fertility; environmental gradient

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministere des Ressources naturelles et de la Faune (MRNF) of Quebec
  2. Agriculture and Agri-food Canada (Agricultural Greenhouse Gas Program)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we developed clone-specific allometric relationships, with the objective of calculating volume and biomass production after 13 years in 8 poplar plantations, located across an environmental gradient, and composed of 5 unrelated hybrid poplar clones. Allometry was found to be very similar for clones MxB-915311, NxM-3729 and DNxM-915508, all having P. maximoviczii parentage. Clones DxN-3570 and TxD-3230 also had a similar allometry; for a given DBH they have a lower stem volume, stem biomass and branch biomass than P. maximoviczii hybrids. Strong Site x Clone interactions were observed for volume and woody biomass growth, with DxN and TxD hybrids only productive on low elevation fertile sites, whereas P. maximovizcii hybrids were also very productive on higher elevation sites with moderate to high soil fertility. At the site level (5 clones mean), yield reached 27.5 and 22.7 m(3)/ha/yr. on the two best sites (high fertility and low elevation), confirming the great potential of southern Quebec (Canada) for poplar culture. The productivity gap between the most and least productive sites has widened from year 8 to year 13, highlighting the need for high quality abandoned farmland site selection in terms of climate and soil fertility. Although clone selection could optimize yield across the studied environmental gradient, it cannot fully compensate for inadequate site selection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available