4.7 Article

Participatory Goal Programming in Forest Management: An Application Integrating Several Ecosystem Services

Journal

FORESTS
Volume 5, Issue 12, Pages 3352-3371

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/f5123352

Keywords

multi-criteria decision-making; goal programming; stakeholders; forest management; edible wild mushrooms

Categories

Funding

  1. Universidad de Valladolid
  2. Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [AGL2012-40035-C03-01, AGL2011-2585]
  3. Micosylva+ project (Interreg IVB Program) [POSUDOE SOE3/P2/E533]
  4. Junta de Castilla y Leon (Spain)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we propose a procedure for integrating several ecosystem services into forest management by using the well-known multi-criteria approach called goal programming. It shows how interactions with various stakeholders are essential in order to choose the goal programming model applied, as well as some of its basic components (variant, targets, preferential weights, etc.). This methodology has been applied to a real forest management case where five criteria have been selected: timber production, wild edible mushroom production, carbon sequestration, net present value of the underlying investment, and a criterion associated with the sustainability of forest management defined by the idea of a normal forest. Given the characteristics of some of these criteria, such as mushroom production, the model has been developed in two scenarios: one deterministic and another with a Monte Carlo analysis. The results show a considerable degree of conflict between the proposed criteria. By applying several goal programming models, different Paretian efficient solutions were obtained. In addition, some results in Monte Carlo analysis for several criteria show notable variations. This fact is especially notable for the mushroom production criterion. Finally, the proposed approach seems attractive and can be directly applied to other forest management situations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available