4.7 Article

Assessing the Feasibility of Low-Density LiDAR for Stand Inventory Attribute Predictions in Complex and Managed Forests of Northern Maine, USA

Journal

FORESTS
Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages 363-383

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/f5020363

Keywords

LiDAR; inventory; northern forest; silvicultural treatments; mixed species; multi-canopy; random forest

Categories

Funding

  1. University of Maine Agriculture and Forest Experimental Station
  2. Cooperative Forestry Research Unit

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this study was to evaluate the applicability of using a low-density (1-3 points m(-2)) discrete-return LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) for predicting maximum tree height, stem density, basal area, quadratic mean diameter and total volume. The research was conducted at the Penobscot Experimental Forest in central Maine, where a range of stand structures and species composition is present and generally representative of northern Maine's forests. Prediction models were developed utilizing the random forest algorithm that was calibrated using reference data collected in fixed radius circular plots. For comparison, the volume model used two sets of reference data, with one being fixed radius circular plots and the other variable radius plots. Prediction biases were evaluated with respect to five silvicultural treatments and softwood species composition based on the coefficient of determination (R-2), root mean square error and mean bias, as well as residual scatter plots. Overall, this study found that LiDAR tended to underestimate maximum tree height and volume. The maximum tree height and volume models had R-2 values of 86.9% and 72.1%, respectively. The accuracy of volume prediction was also sensitive to the plot type used. While it was difficult to develop models with a high R-2, due to the complexities of Maine's forest structures and species composition, the results suggest that low density LiDAR can be used as a supporting tool in forest management for this region.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available