4.1 Review

The minimum clinically important difference for EQ-5D index: a critical review

Journal

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1586/14737167.2014.894462

Keywords

EQ-5D; smallest worthwhile effect; minimum relevant difference; review; minimum clinically important difference; Euro QoL

Funding

  1. Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorates
  2. Chief Scientist Office [HERU1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D) is the most common instrument to value health outcomes under the patient's perspective. Several studies have investigated whether observed changes are meaningful to patients, using a variety of approaches to estimate the minimum clinically important difference (MCID). This study provides an overview of the state of art of the estimation of the MCID for the three-level EQ-5D index based on the UK scoring algorithm, critically assessing the available evidence. The interest in estimation of MCID for the EQ-5D has been increasing in recent years. However, some additional standardization in the estimation procedures may be of value, in order to enhance the ability to make comparisons across measures and disease areas. Further methodological research might also contribute to reducing gaps between theory and practice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available