4.1 Review

Interpreting patient-reported outcome results: US FDA guidance and emerging methods

Journal

Publisher

EXPERT REVIEWS
DOI: 10.1586/ERP.11.12

Keywords

individual change; minimal important differences; reliable change index; responder

Funding

  1. NIH/NIA [P30-AG028748, P30-AG021684]
  2. NCMHD [2P20MD000182]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In recent years, the US FDA has become more critical of instruments used to measure patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical trials. To facilitate decisions related to the approval of drugs, labels and promotional claims based on PROs, the FDA created the Study Endpoints and Label Development (SEALD) group. SEALD has developed a PRO guidance related to the use of PRO measures used to support drug approvals and label claims, including recommendations for establishing thresholds for meaningful change at the individual level (i.e., defining a responder). This article examines in detail the FDA-recommended methodology for defining a responder and analyzing responder-based PRO measure results. We also present other responder analysis approaches for consideration in furthering the precision and interpretation of this methodology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available