4.5 Article

Diurnal patterns of gas-exchange and metabolic pools in tundra plants during three phases of the arctic growing season

Journal

ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages 375-388

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.467

Keywords

Alaska; circadian clock; photoperiod; photosynthesis; respiration; sugars; total nonstructural carbohydrates; tussock tundra

Funding

  1. Arctic Natural Sciences Program within the National Science Foundation Office of Polar Programs (NSF) [806776]
  2. Division Of Polar Programs
  3. Directorate For Geosciences [0806983] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Arctic tundra plant communities are subject to a short growing season that is the primary period in which carbon is sequestered for growth and survival. This period is often characterized by 24-h photoperiods for several months a year. To compensate for the short growing season tundra plants may extend their carbon uptake capacity on a diurnal basis, but whether this is true remains unknown. Here, we examined in situ diurnal patterns of physiological activity and foliar metabolites during the early, mid, and late growing season in seven arctic species under light-saturated conditions. We found clear diurnal patterns in photosynthesis and respiration, with midday peaks and midnight lulls indicative of circadian regulation. Diurnal patterns in foliar metabolite concentrations were less distinct between the species and across seasons, suggesting that metabolic pools are likely governed by proximate external factors. This understanding of diurnal physiology will also enhance the parameterization of process-based models, which will aid in better predicting future carbon dynamics for the tundra. This becomes even more critical considering the rapid changes that are occurring circumpolarly that are altering plant community structure, function, and ultimately regional and global carbon budgets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available