4.5 Article

Clock gene variation in Tachycineta swallows

Journal

ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages 95-105

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.73

Keywords

Circadian; Clock; polyglutamine; Tachycineta; time of breeding; tree swallow

Funding

  1. Cornell Lab of Ornithology
  2. National Science Foundation [DEB-0814277, DEB-0717021, IOS-0744753, OISE-0730180]
  3. Direct For Biological Sciences
  4. Division Of Environmental Biology [0814277] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Many animals use photoperiod cues to synchronize reproduction with environmental conditions and thereby improve their reproductive success. The circadian clock, which creates endogenous behavioral and physiological rhythms typically entrained to photoperiod, is well characterized at the molecular level. Recent work provided evidence for an association between Clock poly-Q length polymorphism and latitude and, within a population, an association with the date of laying and the length of the incubation period. Despite relatively high overall breeding synchrony, the timing of clutch initiation has a large impact on the fitness of swallows in the genus Tachycineta. We compared length polymorphism in the Clock poly-Q region among five populations from five different Tachycineta species that breed across a hemisphere-wide latitudinal gradient (Fig. 1). Clock poly-Q variation was not associated with latitude; however, there was an association between Clock poly-Q allele diversity and the degree of clutch size decline within breeding seasons. We did not find evidence for an association between Clock poly-Q variation and date of clutch initiation in for any of the five Tachycineta species, nor did we found a relationship between incubation duration and Clock genotype. Thus, there is no general association between latitude, breeding phenology, and Clock polymorphism in this clade of closely related birds.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available