4.2 Article

Experimental investigations of the seismic performance of bridge piers with rounded rectangular cross-sections

Journal

EARTHQUAKES AND STRUCTURES
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages 463-484

Publisher

TECHNO-PRESS
DOI: 10.12989/eas.2014.7.4.463

Keywords

RC railway bridge pier; cyclic loading; seismic performance; numerical analysis; displacement ductility

Funding

  1. Railways Ministry of China [2009G-024]
  2. National Engineering Laboratory for Construction Technology of High Speed Rail in China
  3. China Scholarship Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Solid piers with a rounded rectangular cross-section are widely used in railway bridges for highspeed trains in China. Compared to highway bridge piers, these railway bridge piers have a larger cross-section and less steel reinforcement. Existing material models cannot accurately predict the seismic behavior of this kind of railway bridge piers. This is because only a few parameters, such as axial load, longitudinal and transverse reinforcement, are taken into account. To enable a better understanding of the seismic behavior of this type of bridge pier, a simultaneous influence of the various parameters, i.e. ratio of height to thickness, axial load to concrete compressive strength ratio and longitudinal to transverse reinforcements, on the failure characteristics, hysteresis, skeleton curves, and displacement ductility were investigated. In total, nine model piers were tested under cyclic loading. The hysteretic response obtained from the experiments is compared with that obtained from numerical studies using existing material models. The experimental data shows that the hysteresis curves have significantly pinched characteristics that are associated with small longitudinal reinforcement ratios. The displacement ductility reduces with an increase in ratio of axial load to concrete compressive strength and longitudinal reinforcement ratio. The experimental results are largely in agreement with the numerical results obtained using Chang-Mander concrete model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available