4.5 Article

Do you know what I'm thinking? Temporal and spatial brain activity during a theory-of-mind task in children with autism

Journal

DEVELOPMENTAL COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 34, Issue -, Pages 139-147

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2018.08.001

Keywords

Autism; Children; False belief; Magnetoencephalography; Theory of mind

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MOP-119541, MOP-142379]
  2. Research Training Competition (RESTRACOMP) at the Hospital for Sick Children

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The social impairments observed in children with autism spectrum disorder are thought to arise in part from deficits in theory of mind, the ability to understand other people's thoughts and feelings. To determine the temporal-spatial dynamics of brain activity underlying these atypical theory-of-mind processes, we used magnetoencephalography to characterize the sequence of functional brain patterns (i.e. when and where) related to theory-of-mind reasoning in 19 high-functioning children with autism compared to 22 age- and sex-matched typically-developing children aged 8-12 during a false-belief (theory-of-mind) task. While task performance did not differ between the two groups, children with autism showed reduced activation in the left temporoparietal junction between 300-375 and 425-500 ms, as well as increased activation in the right inferior frontal gyrus from 325 to 375 ms compared to controls. The overlap in decreased temporoparietal junction activity and increased right inferior frontal gyrus activation from 325 to 375 ms suggests that in children with autism, the right inferior frontal gyrus may compensate for deficits in the temporoparietal junction, a neural theory-of-mind network hub. As the right inferior frontal gyrus is involved in inhibitory control, this finding suggests that children with autism rely on executive functions to bolster their false-belief understanding.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available