4.5 Article

Atypical lateralization of ERP response to native and non-native speech in infants at risk for autism spectrum disorder

Journal

DEVELOPMENTAL COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 5, Issue -, Pages 10-24

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2012.11.007

Keywords

Event-related potential; Infancy; Autism spectrum disorder; Endophenotype; Speech perception

Funding

  1. NIDCD [R21 DC 08637, R01 DC 10290]
  2. Simons Foundation [137186]
  3. Autism Speaks Pilot Grants Program
  4. Autism Speaks Dennis Weatherstone Predoctoral Fellowship Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Language impairment is common in autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and is often accompanied by atypical neural lateralization. However, it is unclear when in development language impairment or atypical lateralization first emerges. To address these questions, we recorded event-related-potentials (ERPs) to native and non-native speech contrasts longitudinally in infants at risk for ASD (HRA) over the first year of life to determine whether atypical lateralization is present as an endophenotype early in development and whether these infants show delay in a very basic precursor of language acquisition: phonemic perceptual narrowing. ERP response for the HRA group to a non-native speech contrast revealed a trajectory of perceptual narrowing similar to a group of low-risk controls (LRC), suggesting that phonemic perceptual narrowing does not appear to be delayed in these high-risk infants. In contrast there were significant group differences in the development of lateralized ERP response to speech: between 6 and 12 months the LRC group displayed a lateralized response to the speech sounds, while the HRA group failed to display this pattern. We suggest the possibility that atypical lateralization to speech may be an ASD endophenotype over the first year of life. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available