4.5 Review

Disrupted action perception in autism: Behavioral evidence, neuroendophenotypes, and diagnostic utility

Journal

DEVELOPMENTAL COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages 25-35

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2011.05.005

Keywords

Autism; Biological motion; Neuroendophenotypes; Diagnostic utility

Funding

  1. Simons Foundation
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [K01MH071284] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Disruptions in the visual perception of biological motion are emerging as a hallmark of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), consistent with the pathognomonic social deficits of this neurodevelopmental disorder. Accumulating evidence suggests an early and marked divergence in ASD from the typical developmental tuning of brain regions to process social information. In this review, we discuss a relatively recent yet substantial literature of behavioral and neuroimaging studies that consistently indicates impairments in biological motion perception in ASD. We then illustrate the fundamental disruption in this form of social perception in autism, drawing connections between a genetic liability to develop autism and disrupted associated brain mechanisms, as we describe neuroendophenotypes of autism derived from an fMRI study of biological motion perception in children with autism and their unaffected siblings. Finally, we demonstrate the diagnostic utility of brain responses to biological motion. With the ability to measure brain function in the first year of life comes the potential to chart the development of disrupted biological motion processing in ASD and to specify the gene-brain-behavior interactions shaping this atypical trajectory. We propose that a comprehensive understanding of the development of impaired responses to biological motion in ASD can inform future diagnosis and treatment approaches. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available