4.3 Article

Tracking the Mesenchymal Stem Cell Fate After Transplantation into the Infarcted Myocardium

Journal

CURRENT STEM CELL RESEARCH & THERAPY
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages 284-291

Publisher

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/1574888X113089990047

Keywords

Cell transplant; cross-talk; in vivo tracking; inflammation; mesenchymal cells; myocardial infarction

Funding

  1. Romanian Ministry of Education and Research [PCCA-1-THERION 79/2012]
  2. European Social Fund - Cristofor I. Simionescu Postdoctoral Fellowship Programme [POSDRU/89/1.5/S/55216]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Numerous studies have previously shown the efficiency of stem cell therapy in recovering the infarcted myocardium, by reducing the infarct size and improving the overall global function. However, the functional improvements observed in almost all cases were short-termed and many clinical trials showed that there were no long term relevant differences between infarcted myocardium with and without cell transplant. Moreover, studies monitoring cell engraftment after transplantation reported that cells were poorly retained into the heart and their large majority died post-transplantation, thus explaining the transient nature of the improvements. In these settings, it is likely that the improvement in the cardiac function is not due to the myocardial structure regeneration but rather to the biomolecules secreted by stem cells, which can improve the ventricular remodelling by attenuating the inflammation and promoting vascularisation and cell survival. This conclusion has prompted a re-consideration of stem cell field and imposed the stringency of understanding how stem cells respond to the host environment and differentiate toward a specific cell phenotype. This review is focused on the behaviour of mesenchymal stem cells after transplantation into the myocardial infarction and the molecular changes appeared in the infarcted environment that complicate the cross-talk between transplanted and host cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available