4.5 Article

Inborn errors of anti-viral interferon immunity in humans

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN VIROLOGY
Volume 1, Issue 6, Pages 487-496

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.coviro.2011.10.016

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Marie Curie Intra-European Fellowship
  2. Agence national de in Recherche [ANR-08-MNP-014]
  3. Rockefeller University Center for Clinical and Translational Science grant [5UL1RR024143]
  4. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases grant [1R01AI088364]
  5. St. Giles Foundation
  6. Thrasher Research Fund
  7. March of Dimes
  8. Jeffrey Modell Foundation
  9. Talecris Biotherapeutics
  10. Rockefeller University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The three types of interferon (IFNs) are essential for immunity against at least some viruses in the mouse model of experimental infections, type I IFNs displaying the broadest and strongest anti-viral activity. Consistently, human genetic studies have shown that type II IFN is largely redundant for immunity against viruses in the course of natural infections. The precise contributions of human type I and III IFNs remain undefined. However, various inborn errors of anti-viral IFN immunity have been described, which can result in either broad or narrow immunological and viral phenotypes. The broad disorders impair the response to (STAT1, TYK2) or the production of at least type I and type III IFNs following multiple stimuli (NEMO), resulting in multiple viral infections at various sites, including herpes simplex encephalitis (HSE). The narrow disorders impair exclusively (TLR3) or mostly (UNC-93B, TRIF, TRAF3) the TLR3-dependent induction of type I and III IFNs, leading to HSE in apparently otherwise healthy individuals. These recent discoveries highlight the importance of human type I and III IFNs in protective immunity against viruses, including the TLR3-IFN pathway in protection against HSE.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available