4.8 Article

GPS2 Deficiency Triggers Maladaptive White Adipose Tissue Expansion in Obesity via HIF1A Activation

Journal

CELL REPORTS
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages 2957-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.08.032

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council
  2. Swedish Cancer Society
  3. Swedish Diabetes Foundation
  4. Novo Nordisk Foundation
  5. European Union FP7 Marie Curie ITN NR-NET
  6. Center for Innovative Medicine (CIMED) at the Karolinska Institutet
  7. French National Agency of Research (CONRAD and PROVIDE)
  8. Region Ile de France (CORDDIM)
  9. Paris city (EMERGENCE)
  10. French Foundation for Diabetes (SFD)
  11. European Union H2020 framework (ERC-EpiFAT) [725790]
  12. Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de Paris (APHP) [PHRC AOR09087]
  13. European Research Council (ERC) [725790] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hypertrophic white adipose tissue (WAT) represents a maladaptive mechanismlinked to the risk for developing type 2 diabetes in humans. However, the molecular events that predispose WAT to hypertrophy are poorly defined. Here, we demonstrate that adipocyte hypertrophy is triggered by loss of the corepressor GPS2 during obesity. Adipocyte-specific GPS2 deficiency in mice (GPS2 AKO) causes adipocyte hypertrophy, inflammation, and mitochondrial dysfunction during surplus energy. This phenotype is driven by HIF1A activation that orchestrates inadequate WAT remodeling and disrupts mitochondrial activity, which can be reversed by pharmacological or genetic HIF1A inhibition. Correlation analysis of gene expression in human adipose tissue reveals a negative relationship between GPS2 and HIF1A, adipocyte hypertrophy, and insulin resistance. We propose therefore that the obesity-associated loss of GPS2 in adipocytes predisposes for a maladaptive WAT expansion and a pro-diabetic status inmice and humans.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available