4.8 Article

Antibody 8ANC195 Reveals a Site of Broad Vulnerability on the HIV-1 Envelope Spike

Journal

CELL REPORTS
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages 785-795

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.04.001

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health Grants [HIVRAD P01 AI100148, HIVRAD P01 AI082362]
  2. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [1040753, 38619s]
  3. Comprehensive Antibody-Vaccine Immune Monitoring Consortium Grant [1032144]
  4. NIH Center for HIV/AID Vaccine Immunology and Immunogen Discovery [1UM1 AI100663-01]
  5. American Cancer Society Grant [PF-13-076-01-MPC]
  6. California HIV/AIDS Research Program
  7. Molecular Observatory at Caltech supported by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
  8. Biomedical Technology Research Center program [GM103310]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs) to HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein (Env) can prevent infection in animal models. Characterized bNAb targets, although key to vaccine and therapeutic strategies, are currently limited. We defined a new site of vulnerability by solving structures of bNAb 8ANC195 complexed with monomeric gp120 by X-ray crystallography and trimeric Env by electron microscopy. The site includes portions of gp41 and N-linked glycans adjacent to the CD4-binding site on gp120, making 8ANC195 the first donor-derived anti-HIV-1 bNAb with an epitope spanning both Env subunits. Rather than penetrating the glycan shield by using a single variable-region CDR loop, 8ANC195 inserted its entire heavy-chain variable domain into a gap to form a large interface with gp120 glycans and regions of the gp120 inner domain not contacted by other bNAbs. By isolating additional 8ANC195 clonal variants, we identified a more potent variant, which may be valuable for therapeutic approaches using bNAb combinations with nonoverlapping epitopes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available