4.8 Article

Intrinsically Disordered Segments Affect Protein Half-Life in the Cell and during Evolution

Journal

CELL REPORTS
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages 1832-1844

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.07.055

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. HFSP [RGY0073/2010]
  2. Dutch government [FES0908]
  3. Netherlands Genomics Initiative [050-060-452]
  4. Herchel Smith Research Studentship Fund
  5. LMB International PhD Programme
  6. EMBO STF [312-2011]
  7. Hungarian Academy of Sciences [LP2012-41/2012]
  8. FEBS [FP7-PEOPLE-2012-IEF 299105]
  9. PrioNet Canada
  10. UBC
  11. NIH [R01GM63004, U54GM105816]
  12. Welch Foundation [F-1817]
  13. MRC
  14. EMBO Young Investigator Programme
  15. Trinity College
  16. ERASysBio+
  17. MRC [MC_U105185859] Funding Source: UKRI
  18. Medical Research Council [MC_U105185859] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Precise control of protein turnover is essential for cellular homeostasis. The ubiquitin-proteasome system is well established as a major regulator of protein degradation, but an understanding of how inherent structural features influence the lifetimes of proteins is lacking. We report that yeast, mouse, and human proteins with terminal or internal intrinsically disordered segments have significantly shorter half-lives than proteins without these features. The lengths of the disordered segments that affect protein half-life are compatible with the structure of the proteasome. Divergence in terminal and internal disordered segments in yeast proteins originating from gene duplication leads to significantly altered half-life. Many paralogs that are affected by such changes participate in signaling, where altered protein half-life will directly impact cellular processes and function. Thus, natural variation in the length and position of disordered segments may affect protein half-life and could serve as an underappreciated source of genetic variation with important phenotypic consequences.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available