4.8 Article

HOIP Deficiency Causes Embryonic Lethality by Aberrant TNFR1-Mediated Endothelial Cell Death

Journal

CELL REPORTS
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages 153-165

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.08.066

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust Senior Investigator Award [096831/Z/11/Z]
  2. NHMRC [602516, 294880]
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation [P2LAP3_148447]
  4. MRC [MR/K00090X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Wellcome Trust [096831/Z/11/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust
  6. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [P2LAP3_148447] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)
  7. Great Ormond Street Hospital Childrens Charity [W1055] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. Medical Research Council [MR/K00090X/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Linear ubiquitination is crucial for innate and adaptive immunity. The linear ubiquitin chain assembly complex (LUBAC), consisting of HOIL-1, HOIP, and SHARPIN, is the only known ubiquitin ligase that generates linear ubiquitin linkages. HOIP is the catalytically active LUBAC component. Here, we show that both constitutive and Tie2-Cre-driven HOIP deletion lead to aberrant endothelial cell death, resulting in defective vascularization and embryonic lethality at midgestation. Ablation of tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 (TNFR1) prevents cell death, vascularization defects, and death at midgestation. HOIP-deficient cells are more sensitive to death induction by both tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and lymphotoxin-a (LT-a), and aberrant complex-II formation is responsible for sensitization to TNFR1-mediated cell death in the absence of HOIP. Finally, we show that HOIP's catalytic activity is necessary for preventing TNF-induced cell death. Hence, LUBAC and its linear-ubiquitin-forming activity are required for maintaining vascular integrity during embryogenesis by preventing TNFR1-mediated endothelial cell death.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available