4.8 Article

Cytoskeletal Regulation by AUTS2 in Neuronal Migration and Neuritogenesis

Journal

CELL REPORTS
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages 2166-2179

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.11.045

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan [25115733, 25110742]
  2. MEXT
  3. Astellas foundation
  4. Naito foundation
  5. Takeda foundation
  6. Uehara foundation
  7. Intramural Research Grants for Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders of NCNP [24-12, 25-3]
  8. Health Science Research Grant for Research on Psychiatric and Neurological Diseases and Mental Health from the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare [H23-001]
  9. JSPS KAKENHI [23700406, 25830030]
  10. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25830030, 23700406, 25115733, 25110742, 14J08610, 221S0003, 24500387] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mutations in the Autism susceptibility candidate 2 gene (AUTS2), whose protein is believed to act in neuronal cell nuclei, have been associated with multiple psychiatric illnesses, including autism spectrum disorders, intellectual disability, and schizophrenia. Here we show that cytoplasmic AUTS2 is involved in the regulation of the cytoskeleton and neural development. Immunohistochemistry and fractionation studies show that AUTS2 localizes not only in nuclei, but also in the cytoplasm, including in the growth cones in the developing brain. AUTS2 activates Rac1 to induce lamellipodia but downregulates Cdc42 to suppress filopodia. Our loss-of-function and rescue experiments show that a cytoplasmic AUTS2-Rac1 pathway is involved in cortical neuronal migration and neuritogenesis in the developing brain. These findings suggest that cytoplasmic AUTS2 acts as a regulator of Rho family GTPases to contribute to brain development and give insight into the pathology of human psychiatric disorders with AUTS2 mutations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available