4.8 Article

Escargot Restricts Niche Cell to Stem Cell Conversion in the Drosophila Testis

Journal

CELL REPORTS
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages 722-734

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.04.025

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. California Institute for Regenerative Medicine to the University of California, San Diego
  2. Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation and the UCSD IRACDA program
  3. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology [SFRH/BD/33253/2007]
  4. Ellison Medical Foundation
  5. Emerald Foundation
  6. Charitable Foundation
  7. American Cancer Society
  8. NIH
  9. NHMRC
  10. Australian Drosophila Biomedical Research
  11. NIH [GM080501, CA14915, CA80100]
  12. National Institute of General Medical Sciences [8P41GM103533-17]
  13. National Center for Research Resources [5P41RR011823-17]
  14. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/33253/2007] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stem cells reside within specialized microenvironments, or niches, that control many aspects of stem cell behavior. Somatic hub cells in the Drosophila testis regulate the behavior of cyst stem cells (CySCs) and germline stem cells (GSCs) and are a primary component of the testis stem cell niche. The shutoff (shof) mutation, characterized by premature loss of GSCs and CySCs, was mapped to a locus encoding the evolutionarily conserved transcription factor Escargot (Esg). Hub cells depleted of Esg acquire CySC characteristics and differentiate as cyst cells, resulting in complete loss of hub cells and eventually CySCs and GSCs, similar to the shof mutant phenotype. We identified Esg-interacting proteins and demonstrate an interaction between Esg and the corepressor C-terminal binding protein (CtBP), which was also required for maintenance of hub cell fate. Our results indicate that niche cells can acquire stem cell properties upon removal of a single transcription factor in vivo.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available