4.8 Article

Endocrine-Therapy-Resistant ESR1 Variants Revealed by Genomic Characterization of Breast-Cancer-Derived Xenografts

Journal

CELL REPORTS
Volume 4, Issue 6, Pages 1116-1130

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.08.022

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Susan G. Komen for the Cure [BCTR0707808, KG090422, PG12220321]
  2. National Human Genome Research Institute [NHGRI U54 HG003079]
  3. NCI [3P50 CA68438, PO1CA099031, U54CA112970, KG081694, P30 CA16672]
  4. CTSA [UL1 RR024992]
  5. Breast Cancer Research Fund
  6. Barnes Jewish Hospital Foundation
  7. Theresa Harpole Foundation for Metastatic Breast Cancer
  8. TCGA Project [U24-CA143848]
  9. NCI Breast SPORE Program [P50-CA58223-09A1]
  10. Breast Cancer Research Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To characterize patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) for functional studies, we made whole-genome comparisons with originating breast cancers representative of the major intrinsic subtypes. Structural and copy number aberrations were found to be retained with high fidelity. However, at the single-nucleotide level, variable numbers of PDX-specific somatic events were documented, although they were only rarely functionally significant. Variant allele frequencies were often preserved in the PDXs, demonstrating that clonal representation can be transplantable. Estrogen-receptor-positive PDXs were associated with ESR1 ligand-binding-domain mutations, gene amplification, or an ESR1/YAP1 translocation. These events produced different endocrine-therapy-response phenotypes in human, cell line, and PDX endocrine-response studies. Hence, deeply sequenced PDX models are an important resource for the search for genome-forward treatment options and capture endocrine-drug-resistance etiologies that are not observed in standard cell lines. The originating tumor genome provides a benchmark for assessing genetic drift and clonal representation after transplantation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available