4.8 Article

A Reversible Gene-Targeting Strategy Identifies Synthetic Lethal Interactions between MK2 and p53 in the DNA Damage Response In Vivo

Journal

CELL REPORTS
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages 868-877

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.10.025

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [J 2900-B21]
  2. NIH [ES015339, GM60594, GM59281, CA112967]
  3. Janssen Pharmaceutical (Transcend)
  4. Koch Institute and Center for Environmental Health Sciences Core Grants [P30-CA14051, ES-002109]
  5. Volkswagenstiftung (Lichtenberg Program)
  6. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB-832/A21, KFO-286/RP2, RE2246/2-1]
  7. Ministry for Science and Technology
  8. NRW [313-005-0910-0102]
  9. Deutsche Jose Carreras Leukamie Stiftung [DJCLS R12/26]
  10. Anna Fuller Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A fundamental limitation in devising new therapeutic strategies for killing cancer cells with DNA damaging agents is the need to identify synthetic lethal interactions between tumor-specific mutations and components of the DNA damage response (DDR) in vivo. The stress-activated p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)/MAPKAP kinase-2 (MK2) pathway is a critical component of the DDR network in p53-deficient tumor cells in vitro. To explore the relevance of this pathway for cancer therapy in vivo, we developed a specific gene targeting strategy in which Cre-mediated recombination simultaneously creates isogenic MK2-proficient and MK2-deficient tumors within a single animal. This allows direct identification of MK2 synthetic lethality with mutations that promote tumor development or control response to genotoxic treatment. In an autochthonous model of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we demonstrate that MK2 is responsible for resistance of p53-deficient tumors to cisplatin, indicating synthetic lethality between p53 and MK2 can successfully be exploited for enhanced sensitization of tumors to DNA-damaging chemotherapeutics in vivo.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available