4.5 Article

IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 3: randomised controlled trials in the assessment stage and evaluations in the long term study stage

Journal

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL
Volume 346, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.f2820

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute for Health Research's Health Technology Assessment programme
  2. Johnson Johnson
  3. Medtronic
  4. Zimmer
  5. Medical Research Council [G1002292]
  6. Medical Research Council ConDuCT Hub for Trials Methodology Research
  7. US Food and Drug Administration [HHSF22321110172C]
  8. MRC [G1002292, G0800800] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. Medical Research Council [G0800800, G1002292] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. National Institute for Health Research [06/301/233] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The complexity of surgical procedures oft en poses challenges for conducting a rigorous and comprehensive evaluation. This paper considers the final two IDEAL stages of surgical innovation. Surgical randomised controlled trials are oft en challenging to undertake and require careful consideration of the intervention definition, who should deliver it, and the impact of surgeon and patient preferences. In the long term study stage, better monitoring of surgical procedures is needed, along with improved surveillance of devices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available