4.5 Article

Long term effect of depression care management on mortality in older adults: follow-up of cluster randomized clinical trial in primary care

Journal

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL
Volume 346, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.f2570

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute of Mental Health [R01 MH065539]
  2. NIMH [K24 MH070407, K01MH073903, K23 MH67671, P30 MH085943, P30 MH090333, T32 MH065218]
  3. Forest Laboratories
  4. John D Hartford Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To investigate whether an intervention to improve treatment of depression in older adults in primary care modified the increased risk of death associated with depression. Design Long term follow-up of multi-site practice randomized controlled trial (PROSPECT-Prevention of Suicide in Primary Care Elderly: Collaborative Trial). Setting 20 primary care practices in New York City, Philadelphia, and Pittsburgh, USA, randomized to intervention or usual care. Participants 1226 participants identified between May 1999 and August 2001 through a two stage, age stratified (60-74; >= 75 years) depression screening of randomly sampled patients; enrollment included patients who screened positive and a random sample of patients who screened negative. Intervention For two years, a depression care manager worked with primary care physicians in intervention practices to provide algorithm based care for depression, offering psychotherapy, increasing antidepressant dose if indicated, and monitoring symptoms, adverse effects of drugs, and adherence to treatment. This paper reports the long term follow-up. Main outcome measure Mortality risk based on a median follow-up of 98 (range 0.8-116.4) months through 2008. Results In baseline clinical interviews, 396 people were classified as having major depression, 203 had clinically significant minor depression, and 627 did not meet criteria for depression. At follow-up, 405 patients had died. Patients with major depression in usual care were more likely to die than were those without depression (hazard ratio 1.90, 95% confidence interval 1.57 to 2.31). In contrast, patients with major depression in intervention practices were at no greater risk than were people without depression (hazard ratio 1.09, 0.83 to 1.44). Patients with major depression in intervention practices, relative to usual care, were 24% less likely to have died (hazard ratio 0.76, 0.57 to 1.00; P=0.05). Preliminary data on cause of death are provided. No significant effect on mortality was found for minor depression. Conclusions Older adults with major depression in practices provided with additional resources to intensively manage depression had a mortality risk lower than that observed in usual care and similar to older adults without depression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available