4.6 Review

Platelets and the complement cascade in atherosclerosis

Journal

FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 6, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2015.00049

Keywords

atherosclerosis; platelets; complement system proteins; innate immunity; inflammation

Categories

Funding

  1. Tuebingen platelet investigative consortium (TuePIC) - German Research Council (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [KFO 274]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB 914, B04]
  3. Volkswagen Foundation (Lichtenberg program)
  4. German Heart Foundation
  5. Wilhelm Sander Foundation
  6. Juniorprofessorenprogramm of the county Baden-Wuerttemberg

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Atherosclerosis and its late sequels are still the number one cause of death in western societies. Platelets are a driving force not only during the genesis of atherosclerosis, but especially in its late stages, as evidenced by complications such as arterial thrombosis, myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke. Atherosclerosis is increasingly recognized as an inflammatory disease, influenced by various immune mechanisms. The complement system is part of our innate immune system, and its diverse roles in atherosclerosis have become evident over the past years. In this review we identify points of intersection between platelets and the complement system and discuss their relevance for atherosclerosis. Specifically, we will focus on roles for platelets in the onset as well as progression of the disease, a possible dual role for complement in the genesis and development of atherosclerosis, and review emerging literature revealing previously unrecognized cross-talk between platelets and the complement system and discuss its possible impact for atherosclerosis. Finally, we identify limitations of current research approaches and discuss perspectives of complement modulation in the control of the disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available