4.5 Article

Maternal and paternal contribution to intergenerational recurrence of breech delivery: population based cohort study

Journal

BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL
Volume 336, Issue 7649, Pages 872-876

Publisher

B M J PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39505.436539.BE

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To investigate intergenerational recurrence of breech delivery, with a hypothesis that both women and men delivered in breech presentation contribute to increased risk of breech delivery in their offspring. Design Population based cohort study for two generations. Setting Data from the medical birth registry of Norway, based on all births in Norway 1967-2004 (2.2 million births). Participants Generational data were provided through linkage by national identification numbers, forming 451393 mother-offspring units and 295 253 father-offspring units. We included units where both parents and offspring were singletons and offspring were first born, forming 232 704 mother-offspring units and 154 851 father-offspring units for our analyses. Main outcome measure Breech delivery in the second generation. Results Men and women who themselves were delivered in breech presentation had more than twice the risk of breech delivery in their own first pregnancies compared with men and women who had been cephalic presentations (odds ratios 2.2, 95% confidence interval 1.8 to 2.7, and 2.2, 1.9 to 2.5, for men and women, respectively). The strongest risks of recurrence were found for vaginally delivered offspring and were equally strong for men and women. Increased risk of recurrence of breech delivery in offspring was present only for parents delivered at term. Conclusion Intergenerational recurrence risk of breech delivery in offspring was equally high when transmitted through fathers and mothers. It seems reasonable to attribute the observed pattern of familial predisposition to term breech delivery to genetic inheritance, predominantly through the fetus.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available