Journal
BMJ OPEN
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages -Publisher
BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004385
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- Cancer Research Campaign
- National Institute of Health
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Objective: In patients who have undergone a potentially curative resection of colorectal cancer, does a 'second-look' operation to resect recurrence, prompted by monthly monitoring of carcinoembryonic antigen, confer a survival benefit? Design: A randomised controlled trial recruiting patients from 1982 to 1993 was recovered under the Restoring Invisible and Abandoned Trials (RIAT) initiative. Setting: 58 hospitals in the UK. Participants: From 1982 to 1993, 1447 patients were enrolled. Of these 216 met the criteria for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) elevation and were randomised to 'Aggressive' or 'Conventional' arms. Interventions: 'Second-look' surgery with intention to remove any recurrence discovered. Primary outcome measure: Survival. Results: By February 1993, 91/108 patients had died in the 'Aggressive arm' and 88/108 in the 'Conventional' arm (relative risk= 1.16, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.37). By 2011 a further 25 randomised patients had died. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no difference in long-term survival. Conclusions: The trial was closed in 1993 following a recommendation from the Data Monitoring Committee that it was highly unlikely that any survival advantage would be demonstrated for CEA prompted second-look surgery. This conclusion was confirmed by repeat analysis of survival times after 20 years.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available