4.6 Article

The impact of a health professional recommendation on weight loss attempts in overweight and obese British adults: a cross-sectional analysis

Journal

BMJ OPEN
Volume 3, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003693

Keywords

Weight Loss; Lose Weight; Health Professional Advice; Doctor Advice; Primary Care

Funding

  1. UK Medical Research Council
  2. UK Economic and Social Research Council
  3. Cancer Research UK
  4. Cancer Research UK [14133] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives To examine the effect that health professional (HP) advice to lose weight has on overweight and obese adults' motivation to lose weight and attempts to lose weight. Design Cross-sectional survey. Setting Great Britain. Participants 810 overweight or obese (body mass index 25kg/m(2)) adults. Main outcome measures Participants were asked if they had ever received HP advice to lose weight and reported their desire to weigh less (ideal weight 95% of current weight) and whether they were attempting to lose weight. Results Only 17% of overweight and 42% of obese respondents recalled ever having received HP advice to lose weight. HP advice was associated with wanting to weigh less (89% vs 61% among those not receiving advice) and attempting to lose weight (68% vs 37%). In multivariable analyses, HP advice to lose weight was associated with increased odds of wanting to weigh less (OR=3.71, 95% CI 2.10 to 6.55) and attempting to lose weight (OR=3.53, 95% CI 2.44 to 5.10) independent of demographic characteristics and weight status. Conclusions HP advice to lose weight appears to increase motivation to lose weight and weight loss behaviour, but only a minority of overweight or obese adults receive such advice. Better training for HPs in delivering brief weight counselling could offer an opportunity to improve obese patients' motivation to lose weight.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available