4.6 Article

The association of dental plaque with cancer mortality in Sweden. A longitudinal study

Journal

BMJ OPEN
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001083

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministry of Health and Social Affairs [F84/189]
  2. Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
  3. Finnish Medical Society, Helsinki
  4. Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland [TI020Y0003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: To study whether the amount of dental plaque, which indicates poor oral hygiene and is potential source of oral infections, associates with premature death from cancer. Design: Prospective cohort study. Participants: 1390 randomly selected healthy young Swedes followed up from 1985 to 2009. All subjects underwent oral clinical examination and answered a questionnaire assessing background variables such as socioeconomic status and smoking. Outcome measures: Causes of death were recorded from national statistics and classified according to the WHO International Classification of Diseases. Unpaired t test, chi(2) tests and multiple logistic regressions were used. Results: Of the 1390 participants, 4.2% had died during the follow-up. Women had died at a mean age of 61.0 (+/- 2.6 SD) years and men at the age of 60.2 (+/- 2.9 SD) years. The amount of dental plaque between those who had died versus survived was statistically significant (p<0.001). In multiple logistic regression analysis, dental plaque appeared to be a significant independent predictor associated with 1.79 times the OR of death (p<0.05). Age increased the risk with an OR of 1.98 (p<0.05) and gender (men) with an OR of 1.91 (p<0.05). The malignancies were more widely scattered in men, while breast cancer was the most frequent cause of death in women. Conclusions: This study hypothesis was confirmed by showing that poor oral hygiene, as reflected in the amount of dental plaque, was associated with increased cancer mortality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available