Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.UK radical prostatectomy outcomes and surgeon case volume: based on an analysis of the British Association of Urological Surgeons Complex Operations Database
Sean G. Vesey et al.
BJU INTERNATIONAL (2012)
Surgical margin status among men with organ-confined (pT2) prostate cancer: a population-based study
Nathan Lawrentschuk et al.
CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL (2011)
Radical Prostatectomy at Academic Versus Nonacademic Institutions: A Population Based Analysis
Quoc-Dien Trinh et al.
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2011)
Fellowship Training as a Modifier of the Surgical Learning Curve
Fernando J. Bianco et al.
ACADEMIC MEDICINE (2010)
Annual Surgical Caseload and Open Radical Prostatectomy Outcomes: Improving Temporal Trends
Lars Budeaus et al.
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2010)
Pathological Stage T2 Subgroups to Predict Biochemical Recurrence After Prostatectomy
Yakup Kordan et al.
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2009)
Prediction of Gleason score upgrading in low-risk prostate cancers diagnosed via multi (≥12)-core prostate biopsy
Sung Kyu Hong et al.
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2009)
Interobserver variability between expert: Urologic pathologists for extraprostatic extension and surgical margin status in radical prostatectomy specimens
Andrew J. Evans et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY (2008)
Impact of Surgical Volume on the Rate of Lymph Node Metastases in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy and Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer
Alberto Briganti et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2008)
Impact of hospital and surgeon volume on mortality and complications after prostatectomy
Shabbir M. H. Alibhai et al.
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2008)
Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens (Reprinted from The Journal of Urology, vol 174, pg 903-907, 2005)
Peter Swindle et al.
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2008)
Surgeon experience is strongly associated with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy for all preoperative risk categories
Eric A. Klein et al.
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2008)
Prognostic significance of location of positive margins in radical prostatectomy specimens
James A. Eastham et al.
UROLOGY (2007)
Surgical volume is related to the rate of positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy in European patients
Felix K. -H. Chun et al.
BJU INTERNATIONAL (2006)
Impact of fellowship training on pathologic outcomes and complication rates of radical prostatectomy
CJ Rosser et al.
CANCER (2006)
Prognostic impact of positive surgical margins in surgically treated prostate cancer:: Multi-institutional assessment of 5831 patients
PI Karakiewicz et al.
UROLOGY (2005)
The influence of extent of surgical margin positivity on prostate specific antigen recurrence
RE Emerson et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY (2005)
Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens
P Swindle et al.
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2005)
The impact of provider volume on outcomes from urological cancer therapy
FN Joudi et al.
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2005)
Variations among individual surgeons in the rate of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens
JA Eastham et al.
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2003)
Variations in morbidity after radical prostatectomy.
CB Begg et al.
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2002)
Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.
JD Birkmeyer et al.
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2002)
Cancer control with radical prostatectomy alone in 1,000 consecutive patients
GW Hull et al.
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2002)
The effect of hospital volume on mortality and resource use after radical prostatectomy
LM Ellison et al.
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2000)
The association between hospital type and mortality and length of stay - A study of 16.9 million hospitalized Medicare beneficiaries
Z Yuan et al.
MEDICAL CARE (2000)
Share Paper
